Amadeus Biopic Essay Example for Free

Amadeus Biopic EssayTold from the blinking back perspective of an aged Antonio Salieri in an insane asylum to a priest for a confession, the photograph reveals Antonios introduction to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, his professional guarder with Mozart, and his bitter rivalry and betrayal of Mozart. The film depicts an inaccurate account of Mozarts life still still delivers on the pieces which he composed.Throughout the film, were exposed to what are intelligibly historical inaccuracies. I understand that this film is an adaptation of the original Peter Shaffers Amadeus performed on Broadway in the 1980s and for purely theatrical purposes to endow the story with a plot, these changes had to either be implemented or undecomposed purely fabricated in effectuate for the story to make sense. However, some of the senseless interpretations of Mozarts life are besides impossible to ignore for anyone who until now so had even the simplest understanding of his life, such as myself.T he predominant trait of Mozart that stuck out to me like a sore thumb was his high pitched cackling laughter. The depictions laugh for Amadeus was constructed from letters that referenced Mozart having an infectious, giddy laugh much like metal scratching glass according to Forman. However, Robert L. Marshall, author of Film as Musicology Amadeus, discredits this notion as there were no citations that provided the globe of such letters. Since Mozart lived over two centuries ago, theres no possible way to know on the nose how he sounded.However, the brilliant Mozart in the film is supposed to be Gods creature (The Latin translation of Amadeus translates to raw sienna of God or beloved by God) that usurps the mediocre Salieris position as the voice of God. So in effect, his laugh is God mocking Salieri in his mediocrity which further drives the frustration and anger of Salieri towards Mozart and so pushing the plot along. While were on that subject, there is little evidence that Mozart and Salieri actually rivaled to apiece one other to the extreme that the exposure depicts. Certainly, they were rivals, but they were professional rivals.By professional rivals, I mean that even though they often butted heads in their pursuit of music and their attempted publicity of their works, they still admired and regard separately other greatly. contempt Salieri being the inferior musician, he still pooled great respect from emperor butterfly Joseph II and his subjects and served as court composer, director of the Italian opera, and court conductor. Mozart on the other hand came as an outsider therefore did not possess the same influence or reputation as Salieri. To me, this just app atrial auricles to be the politics of music its not what you know, its who you know.Regardless, Salieri really didnt wee-wee a rea watchword to hate Mozart as much as the depiction shows because his influence alone virtually neutralized Mozart as a threat. Im sure when Mozart att empted to get his operas on the Italian tiers it mustiness have certainly irked Salieri, but never to the send of violence. However, once again the fiction is created in order to develop a sensical plot line. Without that aggressive rivalry, theres no movie. One last function that I personally found confusing is that absence of Joesph Haydn from the entire movie.History tells us that Mozart and Haydn met somewhere 1783 or 1784 and instantly hit it off. They both admired distributively others work immensely and Mozart even went as far as to dedicate six string quartets to Haydn as a tribute to the commence of the string quartet. Throughout their lives, they were in correspondence with one another up until Mozarts death. However, despite this enter historical fact, Haydn is still left out of the movie. The movie itself is about two famous classical composers so why not add Haydn to attract Haydn fans to the play or movie?One can that guess as to why that is. Perhaps Forman tho ught that the addition of another prominent classical composer would in conclusion lessen the importance of the feud between Mozart and Salieri. But Forman fashioned other characters throughout the film in order to serve roles that further drove the plot, so why not use Haydn instead? Or at least mention him? At one point in the film, Mozart mentions that he doesnt care for Gluck (which is also inaccurate, he was an admirer of Gluck), but nevertheless, he still at least mentions the name.At this point its all speculation and I cant find anywhere an explanation for his absence. The movie is riddled with other inaccuracies that raise a lot of questions, but if anything I learned in face is true, its that in order to read any literature thats fiction or lookout station any movie, youre supposed to suspend yourself in willful disbelief meaning that enjoy it for what it is without dissecting it in any case much, which I can honestly and integralheartedly say I did. Although it doesn t give an accurate personation of Mozart, Salieri or the setting its supposed to be placed in, it still gives an enjoyable experience.Despite the erroneous depiction, the musical pieces revealed chronologically throughout the film are in fact the offspring of Mozarts genius. Whilst enjoying each piece as much as the next, I dont have the musical ear or expertise to discern which piece is being played in which scene, aside from the operas. However, the films composer John Strauss created a two disc soundtrack for the film and I have to admit, even though I lack the expertise, I am astounded by Mozarts ability.Luckily, between the internet and my own mothers personal love for music (Fortunately, she had a library of CDs that included many of Mozarts work), I was able to essentially find each individual piece in spite of appearance the movie. I have to say, my favorite musical piece offered in the movie is the finale of the Don Giovanni. Perhaps some of it is because of the twist tha t Salieri puts on it that only he understood that the horrifying wraith was Leopald raised from the dead The inference that I took from that between the monumental sounding music and the fervently conducting Mozart in the scene is that Mozart poured his personal misfortune of not living up to his fathers expectations in his work. It just makes it seem to be so personal, so passionate. I know that was the movies intent for me to feel that way, but I couldnt help getting sucked in, between seeing the gargantuan black commander singing in the deep bass voice is what seems to me to be such an accusing tone allegorically accusing his son in front of the world as Salieri puts it.All the while the plot twists during this play, as the madness grew within Salieri as he discovers such a simple way to destroy Mozart. Its just so epic, for lack of better words. One of the brighter operas in the film The Marriage of Figgaro has a much lighter note. Despite all of the red tape Mozart endures, he nevertheless through the exceptionally brilliance of his music and mete arrogance persuades the emperor to allow him to perform his opera.While we obviously never get to see the whole thing, the music and performance we do see is good. I wouldnt say I particularly cared for it. The colors, the notes, the lighting, its just too bright. However, the most impressive part of it is that his confidence in his music allowed him to break the conventional rules in order for his perform his opera. This seems metaphorically to portray the fact that Mozarts music didnt come through these contemporary musical rules of the time which contributed to his genius.Perhaps thats a long stretch, but thats promptly what came to mind. While the movie is composed (Pun intended) of Mozarts work, it would take an entire separate paper to dissect each one individually. Regardless, each piece performed in the play is enjoyable from one degree to another. Overall, I have to say I was more than happy with t his movie. For a while, I dreaded watching the movie sentiment it would be a long drawn out boring biographic film, but to my surprise it overlap little characteristics with a biography.The central thematic message of the movie is mostly if not entirely fictitious, but still lays a foundation in which the movie tells factual information about Mozart and sets a stage in which one can hear the pieces and enjoy them chronologically. To be frank and honest, if these fabrications of the bitter rivalry between Salieri and Mozart werent there, I would have had a hard time truly appreciating the Mozart as seen in the movie. non to say his music is bad, its brilliant, but the underlying plot is what made the movie so raise. Ultimately, if youre looking for historical facts about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, look elsewhere. If youre looking for a movie thats interesting and loosely based on one of the worlds greatest composers who ever lived, look no further.